Skip to main content

The Defendant's Testimony

After the United States of America Presented there case and I have crossed examined their witnesses, the Judge instructed me, of my rights to give evidence. He also note that I am not required to prove my innocence, however the prosecution is required to prove that I was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. 

I did not take the stand, for there was no need for me to take the stand because the from the evidence that was presented to the court. the prosecution did not present the evidence to prove that I was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

As a result I refuse to take the stand in my own defense and the Judge dismissed the case because the prosecutor fail to present the evidence that was needed to convince the Judge that I was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Attorney General Reference (Constitution Question) Act. - The Study

            Drocker Street                                                                                  Cell: Los Angeles                                                                        ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Critical observation in the conduct of the prosecutions Objections to dismiss.

            US Prosecutor Miri Song  Here we have a case that was brought before the United States District Court, by federal authorities, against a pro se (Self Represented) defendant. For the United States Government there were three practicing lawyers; their names are it appear on the Objection to the motion to dismiss: Nicola T Hanna , who was responsible for prosecuting this case in the court; Laurance Middleton, and Miri Song . Upon reading the prosecution witnesses written statement, I could see that there was no evidence sufficient for the prosecution to convinced the court that I was guilty of committing the alleged offence. As a result the pro se defendant researched, and prepared, submitted and served on the prosecuting team a motion to dismissed, the matter base of valid legal grounds (Motion to dismissed). As a result the prosecution team which is made up of three train and practicing lawyers, stepped outside the scope of their ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Motion to dismiss case No. # CC42,6033015

The defendant moved a motion for the court to dismiss this case No. # CC42,6033015 of the following grounds: 1.       Insufficient allegations to prove the charge 2.       Reason for disputes (The oral or dental hygiene tool) impeded the defendants’ rights to enter into and upon federal property 3.       U.S Marshall Service personnel and the Paragon Security personnel actions were not in keeping with their professional authority. 4.       The actions of the Security Detail were in violation with the law they were enforcing. 5.       Federal Law prohibits Discrimination by employees upon federal property. Factual back Ground The defendant goes to the Federal Building in question on a regular basis to conduct business. On the day in question the defendant went to the said building, the defendant clear security, the security took offence and decide...
Post a Comment
Read more